Could Patient Surveys Help Fix Medicare’s Payment Problems? New Research Shows Promise

The Medicare Payment Puzzle: Why It Matters to You

 

Medicare, the federal health insurance program serving over 60 million Americans, has a complex challenge: how to fairly pay healthcare providers and insurance plans for taking care of patients with different health needs. Think of it like this – it should cost more to care for someone with multiple chronic conditions than someone who’s generally healthy. But how do we measure those differences fairly?

 

The Current System: A Game of Numbers

 

Right now, Medicare uses a system called Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCC) to determine payments. It’s like a scorecard based on diagnosis codes that doctors and hospitals submit. The more conditions documented, the higher the “risk score,” and the more Medicare pays.

 

The Problems With Today’s Approach

 

Here’s where things get tricky. The current system has created some serious issues:

1. The Money Problem: Healthcare organizations are incentivized to document as many diagnoses as possible, leading to inflated payments. Medicare tries to adjust for this by reducing payments by 5.9%, but research shows the actual coding differences are much larger.
2. The Resource Waste: Organizations spend significant time and money on documenting diagnoses – resources that could be better spent on actual patient care.
3. The Fairness Issue: People who don’t see doctors regularly (often due to access barriers) end up with fewer documented conditions, even if they’re just as sick or sicker than others. This particularly affects underserved communities.

 

A Fresh Solution: Enter Patient Surveys

 

Researchers have proposed an innovative fix: combining traditional diagnosis codes with information from patient health surveys. Think of it as getting a second opinion – but from patients themselves.

 

 

 

 

 

How Would It Work?

 

The proposed system would:

• Use existing patient surveys (called CAHPS surveys) that ask about health status, daily activities, and chronic conditions
• Combine this information with a streamlined set of diagnosis codes
• Create a new “hybrid” score that better reflects actual patient health needs

 

The Benefits: More Than Just Saving Money

 

The research found this new approach could:

• Better Predict Health Outcomes: The hybrid system was better at predicting important health measures like mortality rates and hospitalizations
• Reduce Gaming: Unlike diagnosis codes, patient surveys are harder to manipulate
• Support Health Equity: The system could help ensure fairer payments for organizations serving historically marginalized communities
• Improve Efficiency: Healthcare providers could focus more on patient care and less on documentation

 

Real-World Example

 

Let’s make this concrete. Imagine two Medicare patients:

Patient A: Sees doctors regularly, has every minor condition documented, resulting in a high risk score

Patient B: Has similar health issues but faces barriers to regular care, resulting in fewer documented conditions and a lower risk score

Under the current system, the healthcare organization caring for Patient A gets paid more, even though both patients have similar needs. The proposed hybrid system would help level this playing field by incorporating patients’ own assessments of their health status.

 

Practical Challenges and Solutions

 

Of course, no system is perfect. The researchers identified several challenges:

 

Survey Response Rates

• Challenge: Need enough people to complete surveys for reliable data
• Solution: Could use multiple years of survey data and improve response rates through better outreach

 

Sampling Error

• Challenge: Survey results might not perfectly represent the whole population
• Solution: Researchers found that three years of current survey data would provide reliable estimates

 

Implementation

• Challenge: Switching to a new system takes time and careful planning
• Solution: Could phase in gradually, starting with a blended approach

 

 

 

 

 

 

Looking Ahead: What This Means for Healthcare

 

This research points to a promising future where:

• Medicare payments better reflect actual patient needs
• Healthcare organizations focus more on care quality than documentation
• Underserved communities receive fairer resources
• Taxpayer dollars are used more efficiently

 

What You Can Do

If you’re a Medicare beneficiary:

• Participate in health surveys when invited
• Share your honest feedback about your health status
• Stay engaged with discussions about Medicare payment reform

 

The Bottom Line

 

While the technical details can be complex, the core idea is simple: sometimes the best way to understand patient needs is to ask patients themselves. This research suggests that combining patient surveys with medical data could create a fairer, more efficient healthcare system that better serves everyone.

 

 

References:

McWilliams, J. M., Weinreb, G., Landrum, M. B., & Chernew, M. E. (2025). Use Of Patient Health Survey Data For Risk Adjustment To Limit Distortionary Coding Incentives In Medicare . Health Affairs, 44, No. 1.

‌